Policies Introduced in the Past 25 Years Related to Education

Over the past 25 years, distinct policies grant been put in perpetrate to influence the educational activity arranging in diametric ways. Some sociologist would say that the primary(prenominal) aim of these policies were to leave behind in the marketization of the education body. Other sociologist would disagree they believe that severe to raise less inequality was the principal(prenominal) intention when It comes to the educational reform. When the New elbow grease came to power, it seemed that policies they were in favour of were to a greater extent(prenominal)(prenominal) aimed towards nerve-racking to induce less inequality of different instills.One policy The New Labour introduced was bleak places in nurseries, this would ensure nestlingren from all backgrounds started educational development early and started to gain skills demand to start school. This would also give operative clear up parents a prognosis to go protrude and work whilst their child is at nursery. They also introduced Educational Action Zones these areas of expiration were giving extra financial support in auberge to lessen the inequality mingled with these schools in worsenedned areas to the schools in amend areas.This is trying to give people of worse financial areas a break in chance to gain access to good schools, and not just be limited to worse performing schools just because they live in a poorer area. They also introduced The EMA award, this was to try and observe pupils to stay on in education past ages 16 (college, sixth form, apprenticeships and so on ) because if the pupils parent earned below a certain amount then the child would be entitled to ? 30 a week to help them with any cost that staying on in education may fool.Although this may be contradicted by the inequalities that have been put in place by the steep rises in fees for univer turn onies, this has meant that working class pupils are at a damage in comparison with the middle c lass. earlier to this the standpat(prenominal) government introduced refreshing cover policies which are viewed as trying to create a market place out of the education system. They introduced several policies in send to force different schools in to competing with apiece other(a) this would then result in schools doing better.They aimed to create a parentocracy, where parents had untold much choice when it came to schools for their children, they were able to choose which school they wanted their child to regard, rather than it cosmos dependant on catchment areas like it was previously. This would result in schools upping their standards to gain pupils and ensure that parents would displume their school, reinforcement was changed to be dependent on the amount of pupils a school had. By doing better than ther schools, more pupils would want to attend and result in more funding for the school, benefitting them and then helping them to improve further. Although, in order t o rank schools against each other, on that point would have to be a system in place, so league tables were introduced and schools had to sit SATs and GCSE exams, the results were ranked in the league tables and parents could typeface through different schools to see where they were lay and pick the best school for their child, much like a market place.OFSTED were also introduced to monitor and inspect schools, they would review the schools standards in several different categories giving a report to be viewed in order to judge the school as a whole and give parents a wider represent of data on the schools, giving them more understanding and a better bottom to choose which school they would like their child to attend. These policies meant that standards for schools rose as they competed against each other and parents had a greater understanding of schools and had more freedom when it came to choice.On the other hand, it did also create problems, because the better schools got mo re funding and pupils, the worse schools werent able to get the funding they needed to improve which meant the gap amongst schools achievement became wider as the better schools got better and the worse schools became worse off this created greater inequality. Schools also started to exclude students that would affect their results in the league tables, this also created inequality.These inequalities may have been the reason for the new labours aim to pass through out the inequality because there was so much created. Overall, The cautious party and New Labour some(prenominal) introduced new policies to the education system the conservative was more aimed towards creating a market in the education system, whilst new labour strived to wipe out inequality in the system and tackle the issue of poverty. Although this being said, the new labour may have created more competition in the system by introducing faith and specialist schools.